Home Ad Exchange News The Summer Scoop On PMax; Risky Influence

The Summer Scoop On PMax; Risky Influence

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

The AdExchanger team is celebrating our independence with a long weekend off! The daily news roundup will return on Wednesday, July 5.

Maxxed

Mike Ryan, head of ecommerce insights at Smarter Ecommerce, posted a Twitter thread about the relative performance of Performance Max, Google’s world-eating, AI-brained ad product, based on 3,000 PMax ecommerce campaigns compared to Google Standard Shopping.

TL;DR: PMax does work on its self-proclaimed merits of effectively reaching a target RoAS. It outperformed humans in four out of five campaigns.

But PMax flat failed for marketers with low-volume sales (fewer than 30 per month).

And consider this: Counterintuitively, overachieving RoAS isn’t necessarily a good thing. By targeting people at or near a conversion, which Google knows based on search history or product page visits, PMax can report great efficiency yet undercut revenue. (Many would have purchased or converted anyway, so why even buy the ads or offer a discount?)

PMax achieves its RoAS score without buying more media, because PMax’s impression share is steady, according to Smarter Ecommerce data and an assortment of proxy metrics.

In Ryan’s words: “In the pessimistic case (right), which I endorse, efficiency is being over delivered. Which potentially means that revenue is being underdelivered. F*ck.”

Under The Influence

Influencer marketing has become a lot more professional over the past five years or so. But it’s still new and comes with real risks.

Bud Light is still reeling from an influencer deal, a Pride Week tie-in that included Dylan Mulvaney, who’s known for documenting her gender transition.

Three months after Mulvaney posted the video that sparked outrage (the content itself was innocuous; the reaction was primarily that Bud Light was endorsing a transgender influencer at all), beer stores in conservative areas are practically giving away Bud Light for free, but still can find no takers, The New York Times reports.

Meanwhile, skincare brand Bioré and an influencer got in hot water when she brought up anxiety attacks following a shooting at Michigan State University, where she went to school. (It was a mental health awareness month campaign.)

The Bioré influencer’s post would probably have created no drama if it wasn’t sponsored.

And, sometimes, influencers boil their own hot hater.

A group of influencers are facing scrutiny for a sponsored trip to a Shein factory in China, part of a Potemkin village-type effort to nix Western reports of Shein’s appalling labor standards.

AI Opener

Meta is offering a peek into the machine learning algorithms that power content distribution on Facebook and Instagram, The Verge reports.

Meta’s automated recommendation system collects public user content, including photos and Reels (its short-form video snippets), and looks at how users have interacted with similar interests or content.

Facebook and Instagram are also providing more tools for users to shape their personal content recommendation output and inputs. Users can take actions such as saving content, labeling things as “not interested” or choosing “Show more” or “Show less.”

And Meta will soon roll out its “Why Am I Seeing This?” feature to Facebook Reels, Instagram Reels and Instagram’s Explore tab.

A blog post by Nick Clegg, Meta’s president of global affairs, frames the info Meta shared as “part of a wider ethos of openness, transparency and accountability.” With regulators and the general public alike uneasy about how AI tech stockpiles, slices and dices user data, Meta’s move could be considered an olive branch or preemptive self-defense.

But Wait, There’s More!

Major news publishers want to team up to address the impacts of AI search and content generation technologies. [WSJ]

The FTC has updated its Endorsement Guides, which provide advice to businesses and others to ensure they use reviews and endorsements truthfully in ads. [release]

Google will remove Canadian news from search in response to a newly passed law that requires digital platforms to pay local news publishers. [Bloomberg]

Programmatic ads pose new brand risks amid the generative AI boom. [Digiday]

New investors bring Moloco’s valuation to more than $2 billion. [release]

You’re Hired!

Gannett names Chris Cho as its president of digital marketing solutions. [release]

Must Read

New WBD Report Makes The Case For Getting The Measurement Basics Right

Warner Bros. Discovery has a new white paper analyzing the data and methodologies of five top video measurement providers: VideoAmp, iSpot, Comscore, Innovid and Samba.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Google And The DOJ Filed Their Proposed Final Judgments In The Ad Tech Case – Here’s What They’re Still Arguing About

Google and the Department of Justice filed the next round of paperwork that will determine what Google’s punishment will look like in the ad tech antitrust case.

T-Mobile Brings Its Mobile Data Exclusively To Vistar To Scale Up DOOH Targeting

Advertisers can now use Vistar to activate both off-the-shelf and custom audiences built on T-Mobile’s first-party location and app data.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.