Home Ad Exchange News The Summer Scoop On PMax; Risky Influence

The Summer Scoop On PMax; Risky Influence

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

The AdExchanger team is celebrating our independence with a long weekend off! The daily news roundup will return on Wednesday, July 5.

Maxxed

Mike Ryan, head of ecommerce insights at Smarter Ecommerce, posted a Twitter thread about the relative performance of Performance Max, Google’s world-eating, AI-brained ad product, based on 3,000 PMax ecommerce campaigns compared to Google Standard Shopping.

TL;DR: PMax does work on its self-proclaimed merits of effectively reaching a target RoAS. It outperformed humans in four out of five campaigns.

But PMax flat failed for marketers with low-volume sales (fewer than 30 per month).

And consider this: Counterintuitively, overachieving RoAS isn’t necessarily a good thing. By targeting people at or near a conversion, which Google knows based on search history or product page visits, PMax can report great efficiency yet undercut revenue. (Many would have purchased or converted anyway, so why even buy the ads or offer a discount?)

PMax achieves its RoAS score without buying more media, because PMax’s impression share is steady, according to Smarter Ecommerce data and an assortment of proxy metrics.

In Ryan’s words: “In the pessimistic case (right), which I endorse, efficiency is being over delivered. Which potentially means that revenue is being underdelivered. F*ck.”

Under The Influence

Influencer marketing has become a lot more professional over the past five years or so. But it’s still new and comes with real risks.

Bud Light is still reeling from an influencer deal, a Pride Week tie-in that included Dylan Mulvaney, who’s known for documenting her gender transition.

Three months after Mulvaney posted the video that sparked outrage (the content itself was innocuous; the reaction was primarily that Bud Light was endorsing a transgender influencer at all), beer stores in conservative areas are practically giving away Bud Light for free, but still can find no takers, The New York Times reports.

Meanwhile, skincare brand Bioré and an influencer got in hot water when she brought up anxiety attacks following a shooting at Michigan State University, where she went to school. (It was a mental health awareness month campaign.)

The Bioré influencer’s post would probably have created no drama if it wasn’t sponsored.

And, sometimes, influencers boil their own hot hater.

A group of influencers are facing scrutiny for a sponsored trip to a Shein factory in China, part of a Potemkin village-type effort to nix Western reports of Shein’s appalling labor standards.

AI Opener

Meta is offering a peek into the machine learning algorithms that power content distribution on Facebook and Instagram, The Verge reports.

Meta’s automated recommendation system collects public user content, including photos and Reels (its short-form video snippets), and looks at how users have interacted with similar interests or content.

Facebook and Instagram are also providing more tools for users to shape their personal content recommendation output and inputs. Users can take actions such as saving content, labeling things as “not interested” or choosing “Show more” or “Show less.”

And Meta will soon roll out its “Why Am I Seeing This?” feature to Facebook Reels, Instagram Reels and Instagram’s Explore tab.

A blog post by Nick Clegg, Meta’s president of global affairs, frames the info Meta shared as “part of a wider ethos of openness, transparency and accountability.” With regulators and the general public alike uneasy about how AI tech stockpiles, slices and dices user data, Meta’s move could be considered an olive branch or preemptive self-defense.

But Wait, There’s More!

Major news publishers want to team up to address the impacts of AI search and content generation technologies. [WSJ]

The FTC has updated its Endorsement Guides, which provide advice to businesses and others to ensure they use reviews and endorsements truthfully in ads. [release]

Google will remove Canadian news from search in response to a newly passed law that requires digital platforms to pay local news publishers. [Bloomberg]

Programmatic ads pose new brand risks amid the generative AI boom. [Digiday]

New investors bring Moloco’s valuation to more than $2 billion. [release]

You’re Hired!

Gannett names Chris Cho as its president of digital marketing solutions. [release]

Must Read

Comic: Race To The Bottom

Chrome Has A New Way To Measure Ad Overload On The Web

Chrome is introducing new metrics that give advertisers and publishers a more data-driven picture of what users actually experience on ad-heavy sites.

Why Wall Street Turned Against The Trade Desk

The Trade Desk is less than a third as valuable as it was a year ago. It retains about one-tenth of its high-water market cap from December 2024, when the company was worth almost $70 billion. Why did investors lose the faith?

Garrett McGrath, President, Prebid.org

Prebid’s New President Is Its Former Chairman, Garrett McGrath

McGrath left Prebid in June following five years as board chairman after stepping down as SVP of product management at Magnite. But now, overseeing Prebid will be his full-time job.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

TV Manufacturer Telly Touts Programmatic Home Screen Ads

Telly, the startup that gives away free smart TVs in exchange for data and ad exposure, is making its home screen ads available for brands to buy programmatically – and pushing for industry standards to help attract more spend. 

AI Is Helping L’Oréal Brainstorm Unique Ways To Reach Male Audiences

L’Oréal adopted creative AI platform Springboards to generate creative ideas that led to a collaborative, ongoing ideation process.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

Google Had Its Day In Court. Now, It’s Amazon’s Turn

Google won’t have to break up its ads business after being declared an online monopolist. Meanwhile, Amazon faces a lawsuit from the FTC alleging that it charged advertisers more than necessary for ecommerce ads.