Home Platforms Google Weaves Spider.io’s Fraud Filters Into DoubleClick Bid Manager

Google Weaves Spider.io’s Fraud Filters Into DoubleClick Bid Manager

SHARE:

google-spiderAs fraudsters swarm like so many bees at the display advertising picnic, the industry is trying to blunt their stings with a combination of automated and manual solutions.

Google has been among the most proactive ad platform players, hiring legions of real humans to review websites submitted to DoubleClick Ad Exchange. It recently acquired Spider.io, a UK-based firm specializing in detecting bots and other forms of digital ad fraud, and more recently integrated Spider.io’s technology with its demand-side platform.

In a blog post published Tuesday, Google product manager Payam Shodjai said Google has started proactively blocking ads it deems fraudulent from auctions within DoubleClick Bid Manager. The fraud types include toolbar-injected ads and ads hidden within iframes. Advertisers don’t need to turn the feature on, as Google is automatically culling these impressions before they are bid on – resulting in a 2.6% reduction in total inventory exposed to demand.

However, the percentage of that inventory varies widely by exchange provider, Shodjai noted. The below chart shows the fraud rates detected across 16 exchanges, with rates ranging from less than 1% up to about 18%.

google-chart-fraud-instances

Baking Spider.io and Google’s internally developed anti-fraud tech into DBM is a key step for the company in that it extends fraud blocking beyond Google’s own supply, where the manual filtration has been effective at screening shady publishers, to outside inventory pools.

But Google still has work to do. For instance, the lucrative video ad sector has drawn major interest and investment from ad scoundrels, but the company has yet to roll out a pre-bid detection solution to block their efforts.

Payam Shodjai said in response to an inquiry from AdExchanger, “This problem is most prevalent in display inventory, so we’ve rolled out our solution for that first and will look to broaden it down the road.”

Tagged in:

Must Read

Northbeam Adds The Third Leg Of The Attribution Stool With Incrementality Testing

There’s MMM and MTA, but no single ad measurement works for brands with multiple points of sale. On Tuesday, Northbeam launched an incrementality tool to complete what it calls “the trifecta of digital attribution.”

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

What Regulators Talk About When They Talk About Ad Tech

If you want to know what privacy regulators think about online advertising, it’s not a mystery. Just listen to what they’re saying.

Keyword Blocking Demonetized More Than Half Of Reuters’ Brand-Safe Stories

The effect wasn’t just limited to news content. The Reuters.com/lifestyle vertical also had some of its brand-suitable pages blocked.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The Agentic Marketplace Is Here. Where Does That Leave DSPs and SSPs?

Swivel and Olyzon’s new partnership brings buy-side and sell-side agents together as early examples of an agentic marketplace.

Comic: Causal Meets Casual

Jones Road Beauty Is Using A New Type Of MMM To Reset Its Media Measurement

Inside how Jones Road Beauty is trying to turn messy, conflicting measurement signals into a single testing roadmap for its media mix.

Comic: America's Mext Top AI Model

AI Is Moving Fast. The Law, Not So Much

IAPP’s Global Summit in DC was a reminder that AI is moving fast – and judges, privacy lawyers and practitioner are racing to keep up.