Home Online Advertising ANA Says Nyet to Google-Yahoo Partnership

ANA Says Nyet to Google-Yahoo Partnership

SHARE:

ANA Association of National AdvertisersIt appears the advertising world is starting to get physical about the pending integration of Google and Yahoo advertising – a deal brokered amidst Yahoo!’s flirtation with Microsoft regarding acquisition of the struggling Sunnyvale company.

As Erica Morphy details in her E-Commerce Times article, traditional advertisers, agencies and its lobbying arm, the Association of National Advertisers (ANA), are getting the message that a Google-Yahoo deal is bad for everyone except Google.

Anti-trust allegations against the Big G have continued to surface and yesterday’s WSJ added to the pile-on with their own coverage of the ANA announcement and paraphrased the head of the ANA, Bob Liodice, as saying that on balance the proposed deal is a negative for advertisers as search concentrates in the hands of Google.

The ANA says that 90% of search advertising occurs with Yahoo! and Google on aggregate.

Representing the advertising exchange industry in the E-Commerce Times article, Mark Kahn, CEO of Traffiq touched on a key ad exchange theme: openness. Kahn said, “Google has long abandoned the open bidding environment…Ultimately, what they are trying to do is drive more revenue for themselves.”

Very true. Advertisers are welcome to bid whatever they want with Google, but that’s where the freedom ends. Advertisers don’t know the price at which a publisher is selling nor do they know how much margin Google is grabbing while acting as a middleman. Publishers get what they’re given. To date, it has been a great model for all – especially Google – but the advertising exchange model changes things.

In an ad exchange, of course, transparency provides full recognition of pricing prior to the transaction.

The marketmaker, like a Google but not a Google, provides the tools of the marketplace so that advertisers and publishers may trade. Publishers and advertisers know what they are buying or selling, and at what price, as well as what the marketmaker is getting. The increased transparency breeds efficiency for advertiser and publisher. Budgets and yields become streamlined and optimized.

Everyone makes more money. Everyone spends more money. No blackbox.

Ad exchanges. Drink the Kool-Aid. But, we digress.

Looks like Google is about to meet the Justice Department, in public. Will they eventually get hammered like Microsoft in the 90s? Time will tell.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Curation Platform Onetag Just Acquired This Creative Tech Startup. Here’s Why

Onetag’s acquisition of creative ad tech platform Aryel equips its curation solution with new tools for tweaking and testing interactive ad creative.

PubMatic Is All In On Agentic AI

PubMatic says adoption of its AgenticOS, combined with strong CTV and mobile demand, set the stage for double digit growth in the second half of this year.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

The Trade Desk Faces Headwinds As Investors Reconsider The Thesis Of Objective Indie Ad Tech

The Trade Desk, once a Wall Street darling, now faces the challenge of rebuilding goodwill across the investor community and the ad tech industry.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Other Than Buying Warner Bros. Discovery, Paramount Skydance’s Priority Is Streaming Revenue Growth

While the outcome of Paramount Skydance’s bid for Warner Bros. Discovery hangs in the balance, Paramount is laser-focused on driving streaming growth.

TV Media Buyers Want Outcomes – So Nielsen Is Introducing More Advanced Audiences

On Wednesday, and in time for the upfronts, Nielsen added more than 200 advanced audience segments in Nielsen ONE, its cross-platform analytics dashboard.

Why Dow Jones Prioritizes Direct Deals To Protect Its Audience Value

In pursuit of ad revenue, Dow Jones is betting on a tried-and-true strategy: direct relationships, first‑party audiences and a disciplined approach to using data to enrich ad campaigns.