Home Online Advertising AdSlot’s Version Of ‘Programmatic Direct’ Aims To Put A Stake In Private Marketplaces

AdSlot’s Version Of ‘Programmatic Direct’ Aims To Put A Stake In Private Marketplaces

SHARE:

ian-loweSupply-side platform AdSlot’s pitch to help sell publishers’ guaranteed inventory via programmatic methods begins with avoiding anything that acts like a private marketplace.

The company, which acquired ad agency workflow provider Facilitate Digital more than a month ago, has launched its Guaranteed Marketplace for direct online display sales this week. And, as AdSlot CEO Ian Lowe wants to make clear, this is not another attempt to make real-time bidding platforms a more friendly and acceptable venue for publishers’ “premium” inventory.

Instead, the 700 global publishers AdSlot has lined up for its Guaranteed Marketplace will simply have the option of putting up inventory — from standard display ads to sponsorships — with set prices based on CPMs.

“This is end-to-end electronic trading of guaranteed inventory on a futures basis,” Lowe said. “It’s not a deconstruction of an impression using cookies or algorithms as a price discovery mechanism. It’s automation of the old world with some important innovations at the same time.”

Although most of the ad industry is starting to understand that there’s more to programmatic buying and selling than RTB, Lowe said that for many publishers, the word “programmatic” in the term “programmatic direct” is potentially misleading. While much attention has been paid to private exchanges and marketplaces, these systems still reflect the prerogatives that were established by RTB, which was the first kind of programmatic option for display and remains the primary activity for automated ad sales.

Many publishers have felt pressured to embrace private exchanges as more dollars shift to automated systems. Over the past year, most major publishers — such as The New York Times, Time Inc., Viacom, ESPN, Gannett, Hearst and Condé Nast — have embraced programmatic sales methods. The primary vehicle has been through the use of private exchanges and Deal IDs, both of which offer direct lines of ad inventory to small selections of buyers and at particular prices.

Recently, some ad-tech companies on the sell side have vied to reach these major publishers with the promise of programmatic without the need for tools to control the auction process. Companies like AdSlot and rival isocket have been telling publishers they can do better by avoiding the lure of private exchanges and Deal IDs.

The way AdSlot’s new platform works, a publisher can expose as much or as little of their guaranteed inventory as they choose. Theoretically, they can unload their “remnant” inventory, but they probably won’t get much out of it if that’s all they offer. AdSlot wants its system to provide a workflow solution that serves all the publishers’ ad offerings. The main promise is the simplicity in executing a sale, as publishers can literally drag and drop products into AdSlot’s marketplace.

Buyers can then come in and model that inventory by audience and a range of other metrics and decide whether to make a deal. Campaign turnaround shrinks from a week or more to two days.

“Publishers are never going to release their premium inventory to a black box where they can’t set the price and don’t know who is buying,” Lowe said of exchange-based buying models. “Agencies are not going to accept it because an auction removes their buying leverage. In our platform, the publisher sets the price and the agency can negotiate with that. There is no bidding algorithm, there is no auction. What they want to do is to simply automate what they do now.”

Two publishers familiar with both AdSlot’s and isocket’s programmatic direct offerings, but who still use private marketplaces, expressed interest in being able to find a better programmatic solution that helps them maintain control. But they weren’t ready to declare favorites.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“There’s an evolution going on now, and at first, the only thing available for programmatic was RTB, and then came private exchanges,” said one publishing executive. “And now there are more ‘programmatic-direct’ offerings. For now, we’re going to try them all and see what works best. But I would expect that each option has its proper place and use case. So I don’t think it’s going to be one model that’s going to prevail in the near term.”

Lowe said AdSlot will build up its roster of 700 publishers over the next few months as it integrates Facilitate’s main agency workflow product Symphony into its system.

The Facilitate acquisition gave AdSlot a tighter connection to agencies and the spending that ultimately attracts sellers. Facilitate captures about $1 billion in display spend from agencies a year, Lowe noted. Following the acquisition, Facilitate’s 40 staffers were added to AdSlot’s 75 employees. In terms of the business model, AdSlot charges publishers based on the revenue that is drawn from its platform. Facilitate Digital’s revenue model is a per-user license fee on the agency side.

“If we have a technology position with buyers on one end and we have a wide range of global publisher partners on the other, connecting the two should give us the best possible scenario under which we can drive the migration of dollars from spreadsheets to our marketplace,” Lowe said.

Among the launch partners on the demand side is NextMark, a media-planning software provider. The two companies started working together last December, but work on AdSlot’s Guaranteed Marketplace started shaping up a few months ago, said NextMark CEO Joe Pych.

“For anyone delivering technology for programmatic direct, partnering is critical to success by its nature,” Pych said.  “No one player is going to have a monopoly on all the supply and demand. Instead, there will be aggregators of supply, like Adslot, and aggregators of demand, like NextMark. For us to serve our customers well, it’s important to connect with as much high-quality inventory as possible. Likewise for Adslot, it’s important for them to connect with as much high-quality demand as possible. By working together, we hope to create the ‘Rodeo Drive of digital advertising,’ as one client called it.”

Must Read

Forget The FUD, Now DoubleVerify Wants Advertisers To Get Back Into The News

Even brand safety companies think news blocking has gone too far. DV is exploring ways to help advertisers support legitimate news and just hired its first-ever head of news.

To Reduce The Ad Tech Tax, Sovrn Expands Its SaaS Pricing Model

Sovrn is now offering its header bidding managed service, dubbed Ad Management, as self-serve software for a flat CPM fee.

play button with many coins isolated on blue background. The concept of monetization of the video. Making money on video content. minimal style. 3d rendering

Exclusive: Connatix And JW Player Merge To Create A One-Stop Shop For Video Monetization

On Wednesday, video monetization platforms Connatix and JW Player announced plans to merge into a new entity called JWP Connatix. The deal was first rumored in July.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Buyers Can Now Target High-Attention Inventory In The Trade Desk

By applying Adelaide’s Attention Unit scoring, buyers can target low-, medium- and high-attention inventory via TTD’s self-serve platform.

How Should Advertisers Navigate A TikTok Ban Or Google Breakup? Just Ask Brian Wieser

The online advertising industry is staring down the barrel of not one but two potential shutdowns that could radically change where brands put their ad dollars in 2025, according to Madison and Wall’s Brian Weiser and Olivia Morley.

Intent IQ Has Patents For Ad Tech’s Most Basic Functions – And It’s Not Afraid To Use Them

An unusual dilemma has programmatic vendors and ad tech platforms worried about a flurry of potential patent infringement suits.