Home Data-Driven Thinking The Promise Of Simplicity For B2B Marketers Is A Lie

The Promise Of Simplicity For B2B Marketers Is A Lie

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Rob Hyams, chief creative officer and partner at McMillan.

B2B marketers’ worlds are filled with complexity – in the competitive landscape, products, pricing, channels, customers and their organizations, not to mention the complexity in their own positions as CMOs and brand owners.

B2B is complexity, and anyone who purports to convert complexity into simplicity is overpromising, probably to get a foot in the door.

Complexity comes in multiple forms. To create the right messaging and tools to drive sales, today’s B2B CMOs need to understand not just their customers and their buyer journeys but also the technical facets of their offerings. B2B products can have lengthy sales cycles – as long as seven years – but also long-term commitments that either work in one’s favor or create a lengthy battle to undo entrenched loyalties.

They need to figure out the internal decision-making process and align sales, product, legal, finance and operations to deliver a holistic customer experience. Unlike successful business-to-consumer enterprises, the B2B exec team may not see value in investing at industry levels in branding or marketing, or may demand a conservative approach that gives middling MROI.

Today’s customer won’t cut any slack. They expect an experience comparable to modern B2B point solutions or successful B2C brands. The buyer journey, particularly with those under 45 years old, is digital and nonlinear from need to purchase.

Today’s CMO is tasked with creating a seamless user experience that anticipates every need and removes potential pain points and barriers. It’s a tall order when gaps and off-brand behavior in areas where the marketing leadership may have only indirect influence – sales interactions, customer onboarding, post-purchase service and product performance – jeopardize the overall experience.

Why not simplicity?

When a marketing leader asks for help with their complexity issues, few want to admit that a true solution to a B2B problem may be more complexity – the only way to put out a fire is a little gasoline. It’s the sort of suggestion that might cut a pitch short.

That’s not to say simplicity doesn’t exist, or that customer-facing creative output isn’t elegant, minimal or even plain simple. Rather, the process of getting to simplicity can’t be further from the promise of it. For example, a brand foundation and top-level messaging that contains straightforward, distilled content is memorable and easier to implement, but to get there you need to add a lot of complexity to the mix.

When it comes to pulling off something successful, there are no quick fixes. Reaching the point of having a simplified message requires navigating a multifaceted and interwoven universe, one that could take years to untangle and reframe.

The key to complexity is prioritization

I believe a more realistic alternative to simplicity is prioritization. When brand, messaging, marketing and communications elements are given structure and placed in a hierarchy, it helps with setting goals and allocating spend and personnel and improves decision-making overall. A prioritized approach acknowledges that not everything can be tackled at once – nor should it be – and the complexity inherent to B2B will continue to exist, but in a less messy form.

For example, a messaging hierarchy typically has simple messaging at its peak, yet each subsequent tier includes a greater amount of detail and explanation. A computer server can be described at the highest level as secure, but at some point stakeholders involved in the purchase want specs, dimensions, warranty information, support contracts and an understanding of how it integrates with their legacy systems.

In B2B, most complexity won’t go away. Personally, I’d rather embrace complexity and find a way to work with it than promise an idealistic outcome. The promise of simplicity may be a lie, but the power of managed complexity cannot be underestimated.

Follow Rob Hyams (@Robert_Hyams), McMillan (@McMillan_Agency) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger).

Must Read

How TIME’s CMS Transition Laid The Foundation For Its AI-Driven Content Overhaul

The CMS migration helped unify TIME’s fragmented content data after years of platform transitions under multiple owners. This enabled TIME to launch its own AI search product and convert archival content into AI-friendly “markdown” pages.

Adobe Advertising Just Launched Its Own Custom Algorithms Product

Last week, Adobe Advertising announced the general release of its own Custom Algorithms product, which is “a huge departure from the TubeMogul days,” Erwin Castellanos, GM of Adobe Advertising, tells AdExchanger.

MFA Ad Spend Is Increasing. Is AI Slop To Blame?

This year, the percentage of ad spend going toward made-for-advertising (MFA) sites went up instead of down for the first time since 2023.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Kickbacks Takes An Outsider’s View While Bringing Ads To AI Agents

Andrew McCalip is a founding engineer at Varda Space Industries, where he oversees the manufacturing of things like hypersonic reentry vehicles and satellite buses.

CTV Buyers Are Getting The Show-Level Performance Optimization They’ve Always Wanted

A collaboration between InterMedia Advertising, Peer39 and Pontiac Intelligence provided show-level cost-per-acquisition data for 94% of CTV ad impressions.

Advertisers Await Programmatic Pause Ads

The IAB Tech Lab is working on standardizing programmatic signals for new streaming TV ad formats, including pause ads. Meanwhile, many brands are eager to add pause ads to their repertoire.