Home Data-Driven Thinking The Future Of Ad Tech Will Be A Return To Vertical

The Future Of Ad Tech Will Be A Return To Vertical

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Ed Carey, founder and CEO at Audience Town.

Between 2001 and 2010, many industry vertical ad networks aggregated the publisher ad space, including travel, finance, auto, men, women and premium. Vertical ad networks were considered a very important growth area per eMarketer.

When real-time bidding emerged around 2010, it required huge computer processing costs and global standards. Funding and building shifted to horizontal ad platforms focused on consumer goods brands. Generalists sold CPG and automotive advertisers the same data sets, UI, tech, media space and results. Programmatic significantly reduced the vertical ad networks listed on the Display LUMAscape, while the independent horizontal companies consolidated in the wake of Google and Facebook domination.

To grow and compete with the digital giants, innovation in ad tech will need to shift vertically to capture new clients.

Filling the gaps

Vertical refers to products, processes and people skills aimed at a single industry. Google and Facebook sell many of the same horizontal products and solutions to every industry, rather than vertical industries.

The people who work at vertical companies have deep working knowledge of the industry, so they are considered specialists. In a vertical company, every employee is a specialist in that industry, not just the client-facing teams.

The horizontal ad tech model has created gaps for vertical ad tech to fill.

Horizontal ad companies overlook big established industries such as real estate, healthcare and education, which often represent the most important purchase decisions in people’s lives. New industries like cannabis and direct-to-consumer also get overlooked. Big and new industries are harder to figure out and subject to government regulations. Verticals can wedge in here.

There is also a gap in positioning. Generalist providers may not fully appreciate vertical client problems or needs, so they communicate with clients in the language they understand – their own. Specialists may have empathy for their clients in a way generalists may not.

Google, Facebook, Amazon and other horizontals are valuable when marketing low-consideration and low-cost products. But things change when the industry products being sold are expensive and highly considered over months and years. Attracting new consumers is different than getting more clicks. Vertical products and pricing designed for a single industry can perform better.

Fitting the mold

A vertical ad tech company molds itself to the products being marketed.

Every industry has endemic offline and client data, for example, that has not been onboarded into the marketing ecosystem or advertising platforms. Unique data is the core of vertical businesses, because certain industries don’t have much online data to inform ad campaigns or predict consumer behavior. This is an opportunity, especially given the march of consumer privacy regulations.

Verticals also write ad targeting algorithms that factor for the product being marketed and the consumer behavior to purchase it. The types of logic needed to persuade a person to click on a $2, $20,000 or $2 million consumer product are very different. The tech, whether it’s an analytics screen or media buying dashboard, can also relate to customers with endemic language and visualization.

And here’s a twist: Vertical ad tech is built on top of horizontal ad tech. All the major horizontal ad platforms offer vertical channel partners some mix of API, investment, integration or support. These mature players are eager to integrate vertical ad tech companies for one very good reason: New revenue streams from new markets is a preferred way to scale their platform businesses.

The future is vertical, again. 

Follow Ed Carey (@edcarey) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

How TIME’s CMS Transition Laid The Foundation For Its AI-Driven Content Overhaul

The CMS migration helped unify TIME’s fragmented content data after years of platform transitions under multiple owners. This enabled TIME to launch its own AI search product and convert archival content into AI-friendly “markdown” pages.

Adobe Advertising Just Launched Its Own Custom Algorithms Product

Last week, Adobe Advertising announced the general release of its own Custom Algorithms product, which is “a huge departure from the TubeMogul days,” Erwin Castellanos, GM of Adobe Advertising, tells AdExchanger.

MFA Ad Spend Is Increasing. Is AI Slop To Blame?

This year, the percentage of ad spend going toward made-for-advertising (MFA) sites went up instead of down for the first time since 2023.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Kickbacks Takes An Outsider’s View While Bringing Ads To AI Agents

Andrew McCalip is a founding engineer at Varda Space Industries, where he oversees the manufacturing of things like hypersonic reentry vehicles and satellite buses.

CTV Buyers Are Getting The Show-Level Performance Optimization They’ve Always Wanted

A collaboration between InterMedia Advertising, Peer39 and Pontiac Intelligence provided show-level cost-per-acquisition data for 94% of CTV ad impressions.

Advertisers Await Programmatic Pause Ads

The IAB Tech Lab is working on standardizing programmatic signals for new streaming TV ad formats, including pause ads. Meanwhile, many brands are eager to add pause ads to their repertoire.