Home Data-Driven Thinking How To Waste Retail Ad Dollars: Ignore Product Stock Levels, Chase Clicks

How To Waste Retail Ad Dollars: Ignore Product Stock Levels, Chase Clicks

SHARE:

andreas-reiffenData-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Andreas Reiffen, founder and CEO at Crealytics.

If marketers are looking to waste their ad dollars, today’s digital ecosystem offers no shortage of options.

They can advertise to a user who blocks their ads. Marketers can place their ads where they can’t be seen or pay for ads that are seen only by bots. Marketers can advertise on sites that don’t fit their brands or pay extra to advertise on low-quality sites. They also can advertise to the wrong consumers on the wrong devices, at the wrong times and in the wrong places.

But the oldest and easiest way to waste ad money may be to advertise products that don’t need to be advertised at all. This is the silent killer of profitability.

This fundamental flaw is often overlooked amid the torrent of news and opinion about fraud and inefficiencies in our ecosystem. But make no mistake – the issue is widespread.

An ad that sells the last unit of a top-selling product may satisfy existing KPIs, but the value of such an ad is close to zero. Top-selling products tend to perform best in sales and revenues, but they also run out of stock. It leads to a situation where today a significant chunk of retailers’ budgets is squandered on products that would have sold within three weeks even without the ads.

Managing inventory and stock levels remains very challenging for online retailers. No web analytics system, advertising or attribution tool takes stock levels into account when measuring advertising performance. So even the largest retailers are making big mistakes without realizing it.

Retailers need to have stock-level forecasts and SKU levels available and connect the back-end systems with that data to make them actionable by the ad tech stack. Inventory management and pricing systems already do some version of this, but mostly in the realm of pricing management because when there’s too much stock, prices decrease. The same thinking should be applied to the amount of advertising a product gets, so that advertising is suspended for products that are likely to sell out. The true value of digital retail advertising can’t be measured until those stock levels are taken into account.

That hurdle is only one factor driving marketers’ ongoing challenges with this inefficiency. Deeper and more fundamental still is a misalignment of incentives between advertising KPIs and a retailer’s true business objectives.

Ad management and bidding systems are designed to target revenues or margins, and this creates a de facto incentive to advertise the highest-performing products. Ads for products that everyone already wants will see more engagement and lead to higher margins, so performance-driven retail marketers are incentivized to push more ads for those products. The problem is, they aren’t the ones that need to be marketed as aggressively. Those dollars are as good as wasted.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Retailers need a better way to measure marketing effectiveness as a driver of business results. Breaking out of the click-based paradigm might require a new KPI metric altogether – maybe something along the lines of “yield.” Yield would always be between zero, if a product will sell automatically and can’t be re-ordered, and the full net sales price, where it’s clear that there is too much stock that will be hard to sell. The industry hasn’t figured out an exact formula yet to calculate everything in between, but the incremental ROI of marketing dollars depends on it.

The back-end data integrations and “yield” measurement would allow retailers to focus on promoting inventory at better margins, regardless of the velocity of demand. Given all the technology that has been developed to prevent other forms of ad fraud and waste, these practical steps are both achievable and warranted.

Follow Andreas Reiffen (@AndreasReiffen), Crealytics (@crealytics) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

Judge Mehta’s Remedies For Google’s Search Monopoly Won’t Cure What Ails Publishers

Remedies in the federal search antitrust case against Google landed with a thud earlier this week. Most publishers and ad industry pundits were sorely disappointed.

Conversion APIs Are Becoming Table Stakes – But Not All Brands Have Bought In

CAPI integrations have moved from a nice-to-have to a necessity for anyone operating within walled garden environments. Now they’re laying the groundwork for an outcomes-driven ad ecosystem.

Peppa Pig

The Media And Retail Deals Behind The Peppa Pig Franchise Expansion

Peppa Pig is everywhere. Whether or not you have children, you likely know the little girl pig from the kid’s cartoon show. But the Peppa media franchise is just getting started.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How A For-Profit College Is Using CTV Ads To Win Over New Students

The American College of Education partnered with performance TV company MNTN to better reach its audience of adults seeking higher education.

Critics Say The Trade Desk Is Forcing Kokai Adoption, But Apparently It’s Up To Agencies

Is TTD forcing agencies to adopt the new Kokai interface despite claims they can still use the interface of their choice? Here’s what we were able to find out.

Why Big Brand Price Increases Will Flatten Ad Budgets

Product prices and marketing budgets are flip sides of the same coin. But the phase-in effects of tariffs, combined with vicissitudes of global weather and commodity production, challenge that truism.