Home CTV Roundup Why Temu Spent Tens Of Millions On Its Super Bowl Play

Why Temu Spent Tens Of Millions On Its Super Bowl Play

SHARE:

Brands throw boatloads of cash at Super Bowl ad inventory every year. But this past weekend’s game stood out for a few reasons, including, of course, Taylor Swift.

It was the most-viewed Super Bowl in six years, according to viewing data from Samba TV. An average of 50 million US households tuned in throughout the game, a 10.9% increase from last year, based on data from iSpot.tv. In response to a survey conducted by data collection platform Typeform, 10% of participants said Taylor Swift was the biggest draw.

But, Swift aside, brands also capitalized on other mainstream trends, such as highlighting generative AI or dialing up their investment in celebrity and influencer appearances to capture Gen Z’s attention.

Perhaps most noteworthy this year was Chinese ecommerce company Temu commandeering Super Bowl ad inventory with a grand total of six ads from kickoff through the post-game show.

At $7 million a pop for in-game spots, Temu likely spent tens of millions to advertise during the Super Bowl this year, not to mention the additional $15 million in giveaways and coupons it handed out as part of its Super Bowl Sunday campaign.

Temu tailwinds

Temu’s spending spree might seem like money well spent considering that its top priority is to reach as many prospective customers as possible. But overdoing paid ads at the Super Bowl may actually have had the opposite effect.

Rather than diversify its messaging, Temu blasted viewers six times with the same spot featuring a jingle about “shopping like a billionaire.” That repetition may be why 21% of viewers surveyed by research firm Zappi said they “hated” the ad, ranking it a four or less on a 10-point scale. There were also numerous articles over the weekend about the Chinese ecommerce company that went viral with an annoying jingle.

But, hey, at least Temu achieved its goal of going viral.

Social media chatter, including memes poking fun at how many ads it ran, led to news headlines posing the very question that a challenger brand like Temu wants to answer for US consumers: “What is Temu?”

But despite its lofty goal of competing against Amazon for the ecommerce crown with promises of affordable products delivered quickly, Temu so far captured just 1% of the US ecommerce market as of 2023, according to research firm Bernstein. Compare that to Amazon’s 40% market share.

But still, Temu is an example of the power of paid advertising. It spent nearly $3 billion on digital marketing in the US last year – making it one of the biggest online advertisers in the country.

As a result, Temu now has 70 million monthly active users in the US, up from just 13 million a year ago, based on data from SensorTower.

Behind closed doors

That’s the thing, though – Temu is on a hamster wheel. The only reason it’s still able to grow its MAUs and app downloads despite sales dropping off is thanks to its relentless paid media strategy.

The number of US households that made purchases on Temu’s app was 20% lower in January than in September, according to Morgan Stanley. Sales also fell 12.5% between November and December, Bloomberg reports.

Temu is throwing so much money at its growth problem that analysts and consumers alike are questioning where the heck all this marketing spend is even coming from.

Some Twitter (oops, X) users speculated that spending such a shameless amount of money on Super Bowl ads while shipping products at bargain prices is an indicator that Temu’s real priority may be stealthy mass data collection, which would explain why it has a pile of cash lying around.

Meanwhile, many social media posts over the weekend highlighted recent data leaks on Temu, including anecdotes about scams and hacked credit cards, suggesting that the company’s privacy practices leave something to be desired. Others warned people against using the app in the first place.

These publicized concerns about whether Temu is even safe for consumers to use echo those that spurred intense (and ongoing) regulatory scrutiny of TikTok, which ramped up last year.

But sometimes it takes a Super Bowl ad play to bring questionable business practices to the forefront.

Well, you’ve certainly got our attention now, Temu.

Are you enjoying this newsletter? Let me know what you think. Hit me up at alyssa@adexchanger.com.

Must Read

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?

A comic showing lab techs as stand-ins for legislators experimenting with provisions for US state privacy laws, including restrictions on collecting sensitive data.

What Publishers Don't Know About New Jersey’s Data Broker Law Could Cost Them

Attention, publishers: Although you might not think of yourself as a data broker, in the great state of New Jersey, that’s not really your call anymore.