Home The Sell Sider Privacy Sandbox’s Latency Issues Will Cost Publishers

Privacy Sandbox’s Latency Issues Will Cost Publishers

SHARE:
Amanda Martin, CRO at Mediavine

The advertising industry has reached a critical juncture with cookie deprecation testing in Chrome. Google’s Privacy Sandbox aims to reduce cross-site and cross-app tracking while keeping online content and services free for all. Sounds idealistic – because it is.

Google has invited players from across the ecosystem to test the Sandbox and its privacy-preserving APIs to assess if the platform is a viable alternative for advertising at scale. Early adopters are now well past 30 business days of Privacy Sandbox testing. And, as with all routine testing, there are expected bugs to work out. 

The IAB Tech Lab’s Privacy Sandbox Task Force has shared its case study analysis, and the report findings were skeptical at best, offering more questions than answers. 

And Mediavine’s own testing reveals that the Privacy Sandbox’s Protected Audiences API (PAAPI) causes increased latency, decreasing viewability and yield. 

Given these issues, publishers simply cannot afford to test PAAPI at scale.

Latency’s drag on viewability

At present, when PAAPI wins an auction, the result is an average increase of 1500 milliseconds of additional latency. 

Publishers aim to reduce latency as slow delivery results in lost impressions, lost revenue, nonviewable ads and a poor consumer experience. Our testing results average a viewability rate of 39% according to GAM when PAAPI wins the auction. That’s far below the industry minimum standard of 70%. Our educated hypothesis is that latency is a direct contributor to low viewability, which advertisers will not value.

In its current state, Google is recommending a traditional server-side auction followed by a Privacy Sandbox auction, nearly doubling the average auction time. During this time frame, publishers like Mediavine set variable timeouts between 1600 and 2300 milliseconds. Adding a sequential auction increases latency dramatically, resulting in a direct threat to revenue. 

Best practices have been recommended by Google’s Privacy Sandbox team, including the request for buyers to limit interest group owners and bidding, reusing bidding scripts, monitoring auctions and using timeouts and limits. The only issue is that the auction does not account for any publisher controls or preferences. 

Publishers need the freedom to run auctions asynchronously because the current version of three auctions in succession breaks functional ad-loading experiences, including lazy loading. 

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

This high latency will majorly impact the probability that an ad will be displayed at all and massively devalue available inventory. Google needs to share controls with publishers or the testing can’t move forward at scale.

Publishers have important choices to make 

We know the current publisher experience in the Privacy Sandbox is not contemplated, but that’s a solvable dilemma. 

We, as an industry, have talked about this problem ad nauseam. The early results are leading to a long list of complaints and questions. But those of us who are actively participating in testing can do something about it. 

If testing is a threat to monetization, so is the product as a whole. We need to make that clear. 

Mediavine has shared all of our results with the Privacy Sandbox team. We recognize PAAPI is not an end solution but a work in progress that requires feedback. Publishers need more controls and reporting capabilities within the Sandbox now. 

Currently, publishers face restricted alternatives. One option is to make a huge investment in becoming a top level seller, forgoing any AdX demand. The other is to continue to benefit from AdX but resign all semblance of control and reporting in PAAPI. This ultimatum creates an undue hardship for publishers. We hope that providing feedback at this stage gets us to a place where we can continue to test and work with our partners on solutions.  

Where does the Sandbox go from here? 

Google has been clear. The Privacy Sandbox is “not designed to offer 1:1 replacements for third-party cookies or cross-site identifiers.” 

The industry needs to work together to make significant improvements to user privacy. A viable alternative for advertising dollars is better than no alternative.

Here are some recommendations for the industry to take immediate action: 

  • The time is now, even if it’s uncomfortable. If you’re not currently testing the Sandbox or one of the related APIs, you’re lagging behind your partners and competitors. 
  • Share your results. The more often the buy and sell sides have an opportunity to align on questions and asks for Google, the better our chances of improving the current solutions. The Privacy Sandbox team, IAB Tech Lab and the CMA are all invested in this analysis.
  • Continue to test despite setbacks. Remember, the present discoveries represent preliminary findings and do not constitute a definitive analysis of the offering. This is one step in the journey to privacy-centric advertising. 
  • Be prepared to wait. Even with a proactive approach to testing and feedback cycles, there will be a delay. Privacy-centric programmatic advertising was not built in a day. 

The deprecation of third-party cookies is undoubtedly a transformative moment for digital advertising. Privacy Sandbox may not be the solution we all expected it to be, but there’s only one way to find that out – rigorous testing. 

In doing so, the industry can not only adapt but take some control over the cookieless future, turning this challenge into an opportunity for improved advertising experiences.

The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Follow Mediavine and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

For more articles featuring Amanda Martin, click here.

Must Read

Google in the antitrust crosshairs (Law concept. Single line draw design. Full length animation illustration. High quality 4k footage)

Google And The DOJ Recap Their Cases In The Countdown To Closing Arguments

If you’re trying to read more than 1,000 pages of legal documents about the US v. Google ad tech antitrust case on Election Day, you’ve come to the right place.

NYT’s Ad And Subscription Revenue Surge As WaPo Flails

While WaPo recently lost 250,000 subscribers due to concerns over its journalistic independence, NYT added 260,000 subscriptions in Q3 thanks largely to the popularity of its non-news offerings.

Mark Proulx, global director of media quality & responsibility, Kenvue

How Kenvue Avoided $3 Million In Wasted Media Spend

Stop thinking about brand safety verification as “insurance” – a way to avoid undesirable content – and start thinking about it as an opportunity to build positive brand associations, says Kenvue’s Mark Proulx.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Lunch Is Searched

Based On Its Q3 Earnings, Maybe AIphabet Should Just Change Its Name To AI-phabet

Google hit some impressive revenue benchmarks in Q3. But investors seemed to only have eyes for AI.

Reddit’s Ads Biz Exploded In Q3, Albeit From A Small Base

Ad revenue grew 56% YOY even without some of Reddit’s shiny new ad products, including generative AI creative tools and in-comment ads, being fully integrated into its platform.

Freestar Is Taking The ‘Baby Carrot’ Approach To Curation

Freestar adopted a new approach to curation developed by Audigent that gives buyers a priority lane to publisher inventory with higher viewability and attention scores than most open-auction inventory.