<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balancing Act For Ad Exchanges: Staying Open While Closing the Door on Harmful Content And Behavior</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adexchanger.com/exchange-ideas/balancing-act-for-ad-exchanges-staying-open-while-closing-the-door-on-harmful-content-and-behavior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/exchange-ideas/balancing-act-for-ad-exchanges-staying-open-while-closing-the-door-on-harmful-content-and-behavior/</link>
	<description>Digital media optimization news and discussion website.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rightmediablog.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Balancing Act For Ad Exchanges</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/exchange-ideas/balancing-act-for-ad-exchanges-staying-open-while-closing-the-door-on-harmful-content-and-behavior/#comment-3180</link>
		<dc:creator>rightmediablog.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Balancing Act For Ad Exchanges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=10197#comment-3180</guid>
		<description>[...] following is an excerpt from an AdExchanger.com article by Bennie Smith, Yahoo! VP Exchange Operations/Platform [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following is an excerpt from an AdExchanger.com article by Bennie Smith, Yahoo! VP Exchange Operations/Platform [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Guldimann</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/exchange-ideas/balancing-act-for-ad-exchanges-staying-open-while-closing-the-door-on-harmful-content-and-behavior/#comment-3128</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Guldimann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=10197#comment-3128</guid>
		<description>Exchanges are going to have a hard time preventing malware via a QA process, especially considering the dynamic nature of ads whereby only a small chunk of the ad is uploaded to a trusted ad server, if at all.

I don&#039;t think any control system that attempts to vet each impression or advertisement will find success at scale.

Our industry could learn from ratings systems of financial markets (S&amp;P / Moodys).  A standard rating system that mitigates risk for advertisers and publishers may the kind of value-add that allows premium networks to flourish in an exchange driven media market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exchanges are going to have a hard time preventing malware via a QA process, especially considering the dynamic nature of ads whereby only a small chunk of the ad is uploaded to a trusted ad server, if at all.</p>
<p>I don't think any control system that attempts to vet each impression or advertisement will find success at scale.</p>
<p>Our industry could learn from ratings systems of financial markets (S&amp;P / Moodys).  A standard rating system that mitigates risk for advertisers and publishers may the kind of value-add that allows premium networks to flourish in an exchange driven media market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/exchange-ideas/balancing-act-for-ad-exchanges-staying-open-while-closing-the-door-on-harmful-content-and-behavior/#comment-3124</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=10197#comment-3124</guid>
		<description>So has RMX suddenly (the last few days) put into place new technology that solves this problem or are they just doing the standard corporate song and dance?

Judging by the facts (the continued presence of these ads) I&#039;d say that its a pure PR play and one lacking any real substance.

Typical BS of Yahoo/RMX and others.  &quot;Nothing to see here, move along...&quot; or &quot;We are keenly aware of the severity of these problems and are working hard with our partners to solve them&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So has RMX suddenly (the last few days) put into place new technology that solves this problem or are they just doing the standard corporate song and dance?</p>
<p>Judging by the facts (the continued presence of these ads) I'd say that its a pure PR play and one lacking any real substance.</p>
<p>Typical BS of Yahoo/RMX and others.  "Nothing to see here, move along..." or "We are keenly aware of the severity of these problems and are working hard with our partners to solve them"....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
