<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aegis Gets Pants Pulled: Is The Agency Performance Model That Far Away?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/aegis-gets-pants-pulled-is-the-agency-performance-model-that-far-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/aegis-gets-pants-pulled-is-the-agency-performance-model-that-far-away/</link>
	<description>Digital media optimization news and discussion website.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: togilvie</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/aegis-gets-pants-pulled-is-the-agency-performance-model-that-far-away/#comment-4269</link>
		<dc:creator>togilvie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=13172#comment-4269</guid>
		<description>Nice job pushing the thought leadership. This is one of the most interesting debates out there. That said, I have a hard time with a market where agents make money at their client&#039;s expense. 

I think the finance markets are a pretty good analogue for how this plays out. While there are a number of arbitrage-based pricing models that serve specific purposes (e.g. insurance &amp; annuities), the majority of assets are invested in products that share incentives. 

Note, though, that there&#039;s lots of room for fuzziness within that definition and it&#039;s taken a long time for these standards to evolve. As an easy example, there are still brokerage accounts that get paid on commissions even though churning is ostensibly illegal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job pushing the thought leadership. This is one of the most interesting debates out there. That said, I have a hard time with a market where agents make money at their client's expense. </p>
<p>I think the finance markets are a pretty good analogue for how this plays out. While there are a number of arbitrage-based pricing models that serve specific purposes (e.g. insurance &amp; annuities), the majority of assets are invested in products that share incentives. </p>
<p>Note, though, that there's lots of room for fuzziness within that definition and it's taken a long time for these standards to evolve. As an easy example, there are still brokerage accounts that get paid on commissions even though churning is ostensibly illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

