<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ad Agencies, Exchanges And The Disintermediation Opportunity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/</link>
	<description>Digital media optimization news and discussion website.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lotame Learnings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Disintermediation</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Lotame Learnings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Disintermediation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=634#comment-146</guid>
		<description>[...] I was clued into a great read from our good friend, Darren Herman of Varick Media Management and Media Kitchen from his blog about an article on AdExchanger Disintermediation Opportunity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was clued into a great read from our good friend, Darren Herman of Varick Media Management and Media Kitchen from his blog about an article on AdExchanger Disintermediation Opportunity. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacha Berlik</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacha Berlik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=634#comment-129</guid>
		<description>To my mind the whole situation sounds like 2001-2002. Google came in to play with AdWords &amp; small SEM´s started to roll up the field from behind. The client relationships didnt count that much and the big agencies lost most of their clients search budget to SEM´s. They all grew like hell until 2006/7 - when they where bought by the big agencies. I dont think that the big ones will be able to re-engineer their infrastructure. They will try (and they currently try hard) - like 2003/2004 - will fail, wait &amp; buy in around 3-5 yrs the succesfull, new technology driven agencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my mind the whole situation sounds like 2001-2002. Google came in to play with AdWords &amp; small SEM´s started to roll up the field from behind. The client relationships didnt count that much and the big agencies lost most of their clients search budget to SEM´s. They all grew like hell until 2006/7 - when they where bought by the big agencies. I dont think that the big ones will be able to re-engineer their infrastructure. They will try (and they currently try hard) - like 2003/2004 - will fail, wait &amp; buy in around 3-5 yrs the succesfull, new technology driven agencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stephanblome</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stephanblome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=634#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I think that one cannot underestimate the power media agencies have through their client relationship. Therefore I think there is definitely an opportunity for them to disintermediate with the help of exchanges. I just think that they will use existing tools and / or acquire companies with technology in most cases rather than building it inhouse simply to be faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that one cannot underestimate the power media agencies have through their client relationship. Therefore I think there is definitely an opportunity for them to disintermediate with the help of exchanges. I just think that they will use existing tools and / or acquire companies with technology in most cases rather than building it inhouse simply to be faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Cocker</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Cocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=634#comment-125</guid>
		<description>The big agency groups will take time to re- engineer their infrastructure, process and skillsets around a more data and tech driven approach. They are simply too large and tied into legacy models to move quickly. The stuff we&#039;re talking about here requires such a &#039;root and branch&#039; upheaval of the traditional agency model of &#039;Bigger buys cheaper&#039;. As we all know in an auction, &#039;SMARTER buys better&#039;. For this reason, i think it will be a new breed of smaller smarter tech savvy agencies that will lead in this space in the next couple of years, and they will have a strong enough proposition to win DR/ROI focussed budgets from th big guys. Hopefully Infectious Media will be one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big agency groups will take time to re- engineer their infrastructure, process and skillsets around a more data and tech driven approach. They are simply too large and tied into legacy models to move quickly. The stuff we're talking about here requires such a 'root and branch' upheaval of the traditional agency model of 'Bigger buys cheaper'. As we all know in an auction, 'SMARTER buys better'. For this reason, i think it will be a new breed of smaller smarter tech savvy agencies that will lead in this space in the next couple of years, and they will have a strong enough proposition to win DR/ROI focussed budgets from th big guys. Hopefully Infectious Media will be one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stephanblome</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stephanblome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=634#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with Michael Katz. I am not so sure that agencies in general will be able to disintermediate ad networks with the help of exchanges. Their DNA is client service NOT technology. Rather the differences between ad networks and agencies will become fuzzy. I can see smaller agencies becoming media brokerages and bigger agency groups acquiring ad networks and turning them into trading platforms who buy of several exchanges. I also see bigger ad networks becoming transparent and building out client service divisions resembling a media agency.   

It&#039;ll stay interesting for some time to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with Michael Katz. I am not so sure that agencies in general will be able to disintermediate ad networks with the help of exchanges. Their DNA is client service NOT technology. Rather the differences between ad networks and agencies will become fuzzy. I can see smaller agencies becoming media brokerages and bigger agency groups acquiring ad networks and turning them into trading platforms who buy of several exchanges. I also see bigger ad networks becoming transparent and building out client service divisions resembling a media agency.   </p>
<p>It'll stay interesting for some time to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Div Bhansali</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Div Bhansali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=634#comment-122</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why most agencies would want to fully disintermediate, since that would mean taking on all of the network-growing responsibilities of a network or exchange.

The real value that a network or exchange provides to the end-advertiser or the agency is that they&#039;ve already done the hard work of building scale on both the publisher and advertiser side. By bringing both ad supply and ad demand to the table, the exchange / network allows their advertising clients to focus on adding value by testing different targeting options, messaging, creatives, etc. Those are the functions where an agency can add tremendous value, because presumably they&#039;re directly involved with developing their client&#039;s brand identity in the first place.

The other point I would add is that there are now so many exchanges and networks that any advertiser or agency can try out for themselves, and start using within minutes. The role that an agency can play in helping a client navigate these choices is similar to the role they&#039;ve historically played in TV placement. Agencies help manage the creative aspects, and they also help manage media planning across platforms so that the client sees the best ROI possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not sure why most agencies would want to fully disintermediate, since that would mean taking on all of the network-growing responsibilities of a network or exchange.</p>
<p>The real value that a network or exchange provides to the end-advertiser or the agency is that they've already done the hard work of building scale on both the publisher and advertiser side. By bringing both ad supply and ad demand to the table, the exchange / network allows their advertising clients to focus on adding value by testing different targeting options, messaging, creatives, etc. Those are the functions where an agency can add tremendous value, because presumably they're directly involved with developing their client's brand identity in the first place.</p>
<p>The other point I would add is that there are now so many exchanges and networks that any advertiser or agency can try out for themselves, and start using within minutes. The role that an agency can play in helping a client navigate these choices is similar to the role they've historically played in TV placement. Agencies help manage the creative aspects, and they also help manage media planning across platforms so that the client sees the best ROI possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=634#comment-121</guid>
		<description>It is not hard to imagine agencies starting to build their own mass reach behavioral networks - look at DrivePM.  Many networks want to believe that by aggregating mass reach they are creating value where the trend seems to say otherwise. 

It is too difficult to talk about &#039;ad networks&#039; as if they are all one large blob.  Companies with specific optimization technologies will continue to succeed in specific categories - TURN, Quinn Street, etc...  

Companies with great reach and deep integration across large numbers of websites will continue to succeed in specific verticals - Glam, GayAdNetwork, FM, MomLogic, etc...


Agencies can replace mass reach vehicles for retargeting - they have better access to create segments with their clients data and better negotiating power, especially in this market.

Russ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not hard to imagine agencies starting to build their own mass reach behavioral networks - look at DrivePM.  Many networks want to believe that by aggregating mass reach they are creating value where the trend seems to say otherwise. </p>
<p>It is too difficult to talk about 'ad networks' as if they are all one large blob.  Companies with specific optimization technologies will continue to succeed in specific categories - TURN, Quinn Street, etc...  </p>
<p>Companies with great reach and deep integration across large numbers of websites will continue to succeed in specific verticals - Glam, GayAdNetwork, FM, MomLogic, etc...</p>
<p>Agencies can replace mass reach vehicles for retargeting - they have better access to create segments with their clients data and better negotiating power, especially in this market.</p>
<p>Russ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agencies, Ad Networks, and Disintermediation &#124; Darren Herman</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Agencies, Ad Networks, and Disintermediation &#124; Darren Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=634#comment-120</guid>
		<description>[...] friends over at the AdExchanger (a great read btw) talked about my comments that I made at the OMMA Behavioral event held this past week in Manhattan. I didn&#8217;t write up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friends over at the AdExchanger (a great read btw) talked about my comments that I made at the OMMA Behavioral event held this past week in Manhattan. I didn&#8217;t write up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Herman</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=634#comment-119</guid>
		<description>There are going to be very few agencies who can pull this off at scale.  Afterall, agencies don&#039;t typically build their own technology, and some of the first who do will fail at it (not all, but many).  So if there aren&#039;t enough acquisition to go around, then the time that it would take agencies to disintermediate will be long.

Building Virtual Brand Networks or something similar for clients and being able to action them across exchanges and other media sources is going to be very important to align brand goals.

After all, show me ANY ad network that is fully aligned with a media agency and client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are going to be very few agencies who can pull this off at scale.  Afterall, agencies don't typically build their own technology, and some of the first who do will fail at it (not all, but many).  So if there aren't enough acquisition to go around, then the time that it would take agencies to disintermediate will be long.</p>
<p>Building Virtual Brand Networks or something similar for clients and being able to action them across exchanges and other media sources is going to be very important to align brand goals.</p>
<p>After all, show me ANY ad network that is fully aligned with a media agency and client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Katz</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/ad-agencies-exchanges-disintermediation-advertising/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Katz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=634#comment-118</guid>
		<description>During the OMMA event, Darren Herman of Varick Media Management and Media Kitchen fame twittered “ed montes (Regional Manager, Havas) just pissed off every ad network in the room.” And then added, “I totally agree with him as he said that ad agencies are acting as tech players now and disintermediating.”

In response to this, it will not be that simple for agencies to disintermediate ad networks anytime soon. There is an inherent DNA issue that prevents agencies from going around networks anytime soon (not to mention a fundamental technology gap). The agency model is a service model while the ad network model a supply chain management model. Agencies simply do not have the tools or the expertise to execute a supply chain play. I would be happy to share my thoughts even further on this but I would predict that large holding companies will start to align themselves and ultimately acquire ad networks before they start to circumvent them. Furthermore, look for networks to start disintermediating agencies. Look at Specific Media&#039;s relationship with Ford over the  past couple years. This was not an anomaly but rather the beginning of a paradigm shift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the OMMA event, Darren Herman of Varick Media Management and Media Kitchen fame twittered “ed montes (Regional Manager, Havas) just pissed off every ad network in the room.” And then added, “I totally agree with him as he said that ad agencies are acting as tech players now and disintermediating.”</p>
<p>In response to this, it will not be that simple for agencies to disintermediate ad networks anytime soon. There is an inherent DNA issue that prevents agencies from going around networks anytime soon (not to mention a fundamental technology gap). The agency model is a service model while the ad network model a supply chain management model. Agencies simply do not have the tools or the expertise to execute a supply chain play. I would be happy to share my thoughts even further on this but I would predict that large holding companies will start to align themselves and ultimately acquire ad networks before they start to circumvent them. Furthermore, look for networks to start disintermediating agencies. Look at Specific Media's relationship with Ford over the  past couple years. This was not an anomaly but rather the beginning of a paradigm shift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

