<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WSJ On Invisible Display Ads; Click Fraudsters In China; DSPs and Agencies; eXelate Launches Data Platform For Publishers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/wsj-invisible-display-ads-click-fraudsters-china-exelate-data-platform-publishers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/wsj-invisible-display-ads-click-fraudsters-china-exelate-data-platform-publishers/</link>
	<description>Digital media optimization news and discussion website.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Leathern</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/wsj-invisible-display-ads-click-fraudsters-china-exelate-data-platform-publishers/#comment-2440</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Leathern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=9004#comment-2440</guid>
		<description>One thing to point out is actually that the 50-70c was the revenue for internet access to the access providers -- the number of online revenue is a bit more nuanced and is around $3.24 per hour for search and $0.21 per hour for non-search online advertising (using the IAB/PwC figures). This compares closely to the revenue per hour figures for TV at $0.20 and the point is that it is pretty woeful that online is that close. If you combine search/display/other then online is at $0.36 per user hour vs. TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing to point out is actually that the 50-70c was the revenue for internet access to the access providers -- the number of online revenue is a bit more nuanced and is around $3.24 per hour for search and $0.21 per hour for non-search online advertising (using the IAB/PwC figures). This compares closely to the revenue per hour figures for TV at $0.20 and the point is that it is pretty woeful that online is that close. If you combine search/display/other then online is at $0.36 per user hour vs. TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: togilvie</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/wsj-invisible-display-ads-click-fraudsters-china-exelate-data-platform-publishers/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>togilvie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=9004#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>Best line of the WSJ article: 

&quot;MyProfilePimp.com declined to comment.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best line of the WSJ article: </p>
<p>"MyProfilePimp.com declined to comment."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

