<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Ad Network: Arbitrage Model Dies And Ad Network Lives To Talk About It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/future-ad-network-arbitrage-model-dies-and-ad-network-lives-to-talk-about-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/future-ad-network-arbitrage-model-dies-and-ad-network-lives-to-talk-about-it/</link>
	<description>Digital media optimization news and discussion website.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ad Traders</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/future-ad-network-arbitrage-model-dies-and-ad-network-lives-to-talk-about-it/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>Ad Traders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=3425#comment-968</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Big E.  You are right that the ad network model is not dead yet. In fact, it is vibrant currently. I&#039;m saying down the road the model will need to change and their will be plenty of opportunities for ad networks to provide new products and/or services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Big E.  You are right that the ad network model is not dead yet. In fact, it is vibrant currently. I'm saying down the road the model will need to change and their will be plenty of opportunities for ad networks to provide new products and/or services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big E</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/future-ad-network-arbitrage-model-dies-and-ad-network-lives-to-talk-about-it/#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>Big E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=3425#comment-967</guid>
		<description>The ad-network model has been dieing for a long time. 

it is not quiet yet dead, even with the introduction of RTB.  especially where there is no RTB live on any exchange yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ad-network model has been dieing for a long time. </p>
<p>it is not quiet yet dead, even with the introduction of RTB.  especially where there is no RTB live on any exchange yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

