<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ClearSaleing Reports Robust Growth; AdReady Powers New Yahoo! Self-Service Display; VideoEgg and Six Apart; and Sorrell Sullen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/clearsaleing-reports-robust-growth-adready-powers-new-yahoo-self-service-display-videoegg-and-six-apart-and-sorrell-sullen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/clearsaleing-reports-robust-growth-adready-powers-new-yahoo-self-service-display-videoegg-and-six-apart-and-sorrell-sullen/</link>
	<description>Digital media optimization news and discussion website.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Lillig</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/clearsaleing-reports-robust-growth-adready-powers-new-yahoo-self-service-display-videoegg-and-six-apart-and-sorrell-sullen/#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Lillig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=3391#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>&quot;But, someone claiming to be from the Yahoo! analytics team says the following in the article&#039;s comments: &quot;Yahoo! currently provides a product called Full Analytics (within an advertiser&#039;s Yahoo! Serarch Marketing platform) that provides cross channel attribution tracking.&quot; Apparently, attribution is ready to go. Hope Yahoo! tells its new advertisers.&quot;

That is correct.  Yahoo does currently provide for free, out-of-the-box, cross-channel attribution reporting through our Full Analytics product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"But, someone claiming to be from the Yahoo! analytics team says the following in the article's comments: "Yahoo! currently provides a product called Full Analytics (within an advertiser's Yahoo! Serarch Marketing platform) that provides cross channel attribution tracking." Apparently, attribution is ready to go. Hope Yahoo! tells its new advertisers."</p>
<p>That is correct.  Yahoo does currently provide for free, out-of-the-box, cross-channel attribution reporting through our Full Analytics product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Div Bhansali</title>
		<link>http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/clearsaleing-reports-robust-growth-adready-powers-new-yahoo-self-service-display-videoegg-and-six-apart-and-sorrell-sullen/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Div Bhansali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adexchanger.com/?p=3391#comment-961</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting to compare Yahoo&#039;s new offering with the most similar self-service display product already out there, AOL&#039;s BidPlace SB (full disclosure: I work for this product). Both Yahoo and BidPlace SB offer high reach across the Web (SB is slightly higher at 91%). Both offer advanced targeting options and, within the next couple of weeks, both will offer the ability to build banners on-site.

However, the similarities end when it comes to pricing. Here are the recommended CPC bids for the same targeting on both products:

Run of Network, Geo = Florida
Yahoo: $1.30
BidPlace SB: $0.74

Auto Content Channel
Yahoo: $4.93
BidPlace SB: $2.45

I&#039;m curious how Yahoo can justify charging small advertisers 75-100% more than BidPlace SB for the same types of inventory and targeting? Especially when BidPlace SB offers a full budget guarantee to protect advertisers from over-billing for excess delivery, while Yahoo does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's interesting to compare Yahoo's new offering with the most similar self-service display product already out there, AOL's BidPlace SB (full disclosure: I work for this product). Both Yahoo and BidPlace SB offer high reach across the Web (SB is slightly higher at 91%). Both offer advanced targeting options and, within the next couple of weeks, both will offer the ability to build banners on-site.</p>
<p>However, the similarities end when it comes to pricing. Here are the recommended CPC bids for the same targeting on both products:</p>
<p>Run of Network, Geo = Florida<br />
Yahoo: $1.30<br />
BidPlace SB: $0.74</p>
<p>Auto Content Channel<br />
Yahoo: $4.93<br />
BidPlace SB: $2.45</p>
<p>I'm curious how Yahoo can justify charging small advertisers 75-100% more than BidPlace SB for the same types of inventory and targeting? Especially when BidPlace SB offers a full budget guarantee to protect advertisers from over-billing for excess delivery, while Yahoo does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

